October 2010

Ah ah ah.
great. I like this way of sterilizing Italiot any discussion by turning it into a brawl inn.

In the previous post I complained a way that I liked to do Information mystifying to me these things partially.

So dear George, as before accusing a person does not unnecessarily does not even pretend to clarify ...
I will post to the site to comment, because it annoys me. So I have to do it here.

point by point, in the pink LUCIDISSMO article Messina (I published the post three in the morning, he wrote the article at eight o'clock in the morning ...).

Maconi case: the author clumsily portrayed, but we have witnesses.

awkwardly stocazzo!

Maconi would defuse the case that has been created around him to do but choose the wrong path, to lie in the knowledge of lying.
At that Treviso's testimony Maconi had ended with the application for permission to publish what he raccontatomi and agreeing Maconi he added: "these are facts."

I see lies and I do not see when I denied that the speech of the statements is true.
My speech was very different, namely that you used a tone, to me, sensationalistic and wrong. Then the rest, yes, these are facts, and I have admitted several times in person and even in the face to the editor, which to me is clear, from statements, that in the last two years abundant Pasolini Alleghe and I do not earn a penny in royalties, while I receive constant findings that sell very well at the fair. I have not denied anything, the argument was different. For example, since you have not taken notes of what I said you could ask, for example, to read the speech to see if there was some misunderstanding. And I hope there was, otherwise I do not like the alternative.

Let 's letter of witness:

Hello George,
"social awakening" in part (but not those who slumber, under the roof of houses-in-distant shores paid by parents, is already awake a piece),

do not understand this thing, but I imagine and hope but things are not barbs of you who can not understand.

I am informed by several sources that you questioned your chat with Gianluca Maconi Treviso, and then the "witnesses" would not be such a high spilled a bunch of desperados visionaries.

More sources? I think one, one email Messina. Because I do not doubt the chat, which you have not seen in its entirety. You have reached the end of the speech and did not hear when I spoke of Modena and does not remember saying the same thing a year ago in Treviso. And besides all that I have denied what the "silence fell in the room etc etc.. It is enough.

However, better desperados and visionaries who conspiratorial!

dell'omertà Perissi You gave me, you've played my friends.

fact I want to say that I was there with my eyes and my ears to hear and see the good Maconi admit everything and also add her as well as give you permission to write about.

For permission to write what I said, I believe that the witnesses have even more because I told andandomene aloud. But I had even bothered to say things with precision. And so it was not. And this is what I argued in the post.

The rest of the mail is useless for the purpose of the speech so little man.

And now as Maconi I fix that? Who says mistakes?

Tu.

How do we solve this game of mirrors that reflected not only me at this point I realized whistles for flasks, but also an author Treviso?

Love too much controversy, with you I do not know, do not know, but I'm sure the Perissi by his own admission.

Maconi And then dear, but you think if I speak to witnesses, pirlacchione are so they can not produce anything if you try, or at least portrayed so awkwardly after 14 days of publication of your testimony that you've allowed myself to publish ? I

I allowed to say that yes, I get statements zero di un libro che si dice essere best-seller, ma avevo, purtroppo senza testimoni (grazie della lezione di vita, me ne ricorderò), detto anche che non mi risultava la cosa come me l'avevi posta, e che invece hai ribadito.

Continuiamo con le date che non tornano. Come potrete notare la mail soprariportata è datata 11 ottobre ed è la mail che riferivo di avere in mio possesso in questo pezzo, per controbilanciare una mail di Maconi che Ketty Formaggio diceva di possedere a sua volta in cui si metteva in dubbio quanto riportato da me.
Come si può facilmente desumere ero venuto a conoscenza del fatto che il Commissario Formaggioni avesse la mail di Maconi il 10 ottobre, cioè il giorno prima di vergare the piece in response to the above, then Maconi is wrong here.
's email pua be his Commissioner Formaggioni not arrived a week ago, ie around 15 October day when he was in New York. The mail of cheese in Macon and the response of the latter are between 9 and 10 October. That is a quick return mail of the publication of the offending piece.

Another fun. Meanwhile, I could say "how come you've waited a year to talk about this thing? Also I was in New York for commitments and knew nothing of your article, I wrote Katy Cheese wondering if it was true, and I as shown in previous post I said that was "partially true" and that disagrees with the tone of the article.

And here come more questions.

Shoot!

recap: the articolessa which carry the testimony of Macon is dated October 8, and he says, responding to Commissioner Formaggioni Statesm because while it is in the New York Comicon was held October 14 to 16.
Now if Maconi wanted to send his reply to what is written on the comic strip by myself, because in addition to responding to Commissioner Formaggioni while he is on American soil does not write to us for the same comic strip to let us know I had written in his inaccuracies and give his version?

Because I had to think about other cocks?

We published his version immediately by responding as we are doing now.

In a serious and balanced, well-known.
Commissioner Formaggioni? But we're kidding? This is journalism in your opinion?

Why wait 14 days from the piece to give his version forgetful, and unpacking (it was Treviso Modena .. but it was not a conference but a hosted to an evening ... the books sold at the fair are not counted. ..)?

And here we come to the point. I said it to you in person, because you took me to arm you for a chat in private. Then coming to your stand we had reached the point where I said "think that the foreign rights sold in Spain, I climbed made the" why yes, the fair sold as I understand it is not reported. And that goes for all you publishers, I understand. Aspect of any denials.

Why Maconi in its response, however, does not enter into the merits of international rights curtailed found that the yields of his books in print and sold out?

Why I have not denied, in my post I spoke of nothing else.

After 14 days of the agreed version Maconi know much about now.

wonder if an umbrella stuck in a seat opens up the same. Agreed by whom?

seems Maconi write between the lines have been pressured by someone between the insiders (the phone calls, emails).
Usually the corrections are sent as soon as possible.
passed 14 days which has served this posting?

In the United States does not receive calls and the only people who have I called my wonderful girlfriend and my parents. A Yes, I once heard my brother. And I have not posted anything because I wrote yesterday and I went back to Naples when I was in the north did not have a computer.

Beccogiallo to save the soldier?

Why should I save a publisher con cui non mi interessa avere a che fare?
Non pubblicherò più con BeccoGiallo a meno che non ci siano accordi diversi da quelli che accettai quando ero solo un piccolo esordiente. Senza BeccoGiallo non avrei avuto la visibilità che ho, e questo è innegabile, come è innegabile (visto che ho sentito molte fonti in proposito) che il contratto che ho con loro è assolutamente svantaggioso per me.

A volere sminuire la mia credibilità di giornalista?

Per questo ti arrangi da solo.

Un ultima doverosa risposta.

A che domanda?

Maconi dice: "Questo adattare le cose per personali crociate non lo accetto".Di grazia, what would be my personal crusade?

So, let's put it that way. I do not like the tone that I read in these interventions, more accusatory, more?
I find it silly nicknames and write without using submit for approval when using other people's words. When I had to do with real journalists, I mean newspapers, I do not know about you so do not make judgments, I have always been done to see how I was being sued. Maybe it's a coincidence, but it seemed correct.

I gathered the testimony of Macon and I have disclosed information by telling you clearly (as confirmed by Massimo Perissinotto) that I would.

Make up your mind, talk with me or with your readers in the first case then you could do it in private first, second I do not find the correct form.
You have clearly said you wanted to write about this fact and I have given you permission to do so. And 'what took you to your I do not like, in fact I have not refuted none of the facts.

I was, journalistically speaking, serious, crystalline and ethically correct. Glad you

. Ethically you have to observe a code of ethics for professional or personal? Crystalline
just no, sorry.

It seems that there is a Spectre of the authors who write and call to book answers in of them after 14 days of publication of a piece that brings out the rather awkward for someone?

ridiculous. Fewer films, more life.

would be a double scoop ... The Spectre, and there has saved the Soldier Beccogiallo!
By whom? From what? Please do not put myself in a situation of having to defend even the Yellow-billed because it would be sad and embarrassing insult to injury.
repeat that I signed, as many a contract. And I paid the consequences of my naivety. Now I try to be more careful, but sometimes the same mistake. Too much faith in human beings. Then see how they end things.

La fisiologia della tua verità è lombrosiana.
E comunque tu e Perissinotto mi avete dato del bugiardo e dell'omertoso, solo perché ho detto che l'articolo era impreciso e parziale.

ps: ma se potesse ancora dire la sua, Pasolini che cosa ne penserebbe di queste mezze omertà e mezze verità dell'italico moondo del fumetto? Lui che scriveva su Petrolio che la verità ha la sua fisiologia, e questa fisiologia è tattile, immediata, anti-retorica? Chissà...

Qui onestamente ci starebbe anche un improperio, ma lasciamo stare. Inoltre, dato che fai giornalismo, ti prego revisiona i testi, se non nei contenuti almeno cerca di limitare i refusi.

E come al solito you leave the debate, because instead of building a network of evidence by interviewing various authors Yellow-billed, or former such as me or Paul Cossi, have mounted a discussion that results in personal and does not bring anything to anyone.
closing virtually every interest in the dialogue on my part.
Some offenses do not you lose them, sorry.
not worth the rule of misunderstanding.

Ready to Lucca

And here we are.
missing a week in Lucca, booth appearance Hazard.

(all casual readers or those still disaffected futile controversy, are discouraged from making)

For the rest ... I would like to investigate a speech made in recent times, while I watch the episodes of backward Extra Factor, just to let you know what I am struck by the argument.

I appreciate that he was the star of a case, and also appreciate the importance of my media is equal to zero, in order to curb it.

in Treviso, while I was eating a fantastic roast pork with mushrooms, I was interrupted by Giorgio Messina asked for a clarification on my way out publicly against the Yellow-billed the previous edition of Cartoons on TV. Now ... I absolutely do not remember these two famous witnesses, but it is true that not being accustomed to certain dynamics do not care to the people hidden in the shadows, but I remember clearly saying more or less these words: "I do not remember a thing, but I'm a very absent-minded, if there are any witnesses, even six, it's probably true. But it seems strange. But I remember that once in Modena during a debate when he said that Pasolini was Guido Ostanel still the best seller of the Yellow-billed replied that I was sorry for them since I arrived statements with zero sales for two years. "

The speech is this: The books sell them after a certain period only at fairs, and are not counted in this list that is based solely on half-yearly returns of the libraries.

So, after reading this article I was surprised at the tone of pseudo-sensationalistic and inaccurate. Among other things, I think (because good reason there are never sure ati, unfortunately) that the crimes of ALLEGHE has sold about something like "a dick", was sold at most PASOLINI The crime, which was also reprinted in effect.
But here too ... Guido might have said a flattery because I was a guest of the evening.
Although the weather was likely given that there was still Peppino Impastato.

Fattostà me I would have even beaten this whole story, but ...
A week ago I received an email Ketty Formaggio asking me, apologizing to the disturbance, with great calmness, as she uses, if it was true what was written in Messina. To which
I said "then what is written in the article is partially true, although the sensationalistic tone of the article is wrong and goes to undermine the seriousness of the debate."

uncensored. I'm sorry but I think so. This adapt things to do not accept personal crusades.

The methods of the Yellow-billed, questionable as we like, are those of most publishing houses, not only of those little suckers and causing evil in the Italian.

Unfortunately the system is that it's up to us to decide whether to play the game or not. It 'just talk about it, but seriously, otherwise you may get the opposite intention of the original.
Now, I am favorevole a parlare dello "sfruttamento" degli autori, fermo restando che gli autori sono partecipi di questa cosa per il piacere di pubblicare le proprie cose spesso si fanno anche, ahimè, mettere i pidi in testa. Però molte cose losche e disoneste vengono fatte, ai danni di questi poveri, diciamocelo, babbei (con rispetto parlando). Parliamone, ma con dati di fatto sotto mano e seriamente, senza inventare fantomatici testimoni.

E soprattutto senza fare queste cose... o chiamarmi al telefono per avere delucidazioni, come hanno fatto alcuni addetti ai lavori (fortunatamente essendo all'estero mi sono arrivati solo messaggi con grande ritardo).

Leggete questo intervento di Stassi , VA. Sorry
his manic.